I’m thrilled to sit down with Vladislav Zaimov, a seasoned telecommunications specialist with deep expertise in enterprise telecommunications and risk management of vulnerable networks. With years of experience navigating the complexities of broadband infrastructure, Vladislav offers a unique perspective on the evolving landscape of open access networks and connectivity solutions for diverse communities. In this conversation, we dive into the significance of innovative partnerships, the potential of open access models to transform internet access, and the specific challenges and opportunities surrounding connectivity in multi-dwelling units. We also explore how these advancements can address digital divides and what the future holds for expansive fiber networks in the U.S.
Can you give us an overview of the recent trends in open access networks and why they’re gaining attention in the telecommunications industry?
Absolutely, Andrew. Open access networks are becoming a hot topic because they allow multiple internet service providers to share the same infrastructure, which drives competition and can improve service quality for consumers. Unlike traditional models where one provider owns and controls the network, open access creates a more collaborative environment. We’re seeing this model gain traction in the U.S. as companies recognize its potential to reach underserved markets and maximize infrastructure investments. It’s a win-win—providers reduce costs, and communities get more choices.
What excites you most about partnerships like the one between Gigapower and Flume in shaping the future of connectivity?
What’s exciting about such partnerships is how they prioritize specific needs, like multi-dwelling unit connectivity. Apartments and condos often have unique challenges—think dense populations and complex wiring—that require tailored solutions. Collaborations like this show a commitment to addressing those gaps with high-quality fiber or managed Wi-Fi services. It’s not just about laying down cables; it’s about ensuring residents in urban settings or multi-family properties get the same reliable internet as those in single-family homes.
How do you think the focus on multi-dwelling units (MDUs) can impact urban communities, especially in areas like Mesa, Arizona?
Focusing on MDUs in urban areas like Mesa can be a game-changer. These communities often face inconsistent internet access due to infrastructure challenges or cost barriers. By targeting apartments and condos, providers can deliver scalable, high-speed solutions to a large number of residents at once. This not only boosts connectivity for individuals and families but also supports local economies—think remote work, online education, and small businesses that rely on stable internet. It’s a step toward leveling the playing field in urban settings.
Why do you believe open access models are particularly beneficial for underserved or low-income areas?
Open access models are a powerful tool for underserved areas because they lower the barriers for multiple providers to offer services. In low-income communities, where building new infrastructure might not be financially viable for a single provider, shared networks mean more options and often more affordable plans due to competition. It also encourages innovation in service delivery, like tailored packages or community partnerships, to ensure that connectivity isn’t just a luxury but a accessible necessity for everyone.
What are some of the biggest challenges companies face when setting up open access networks, and how can they overcome them?
One of the biggest challenges is coordination between multiple ISPs on the same network. You’ve got different business models, technical standards, and customer service approaches that need to align. There’s also the upfront cost of building robust infrastructure that can handle multiple providers. Overcoming this requires clear agreements on network standards and cost-sharing, as well as strong leadership to mediate between stakeholders. Another hurdle is regulatory differences across states or regions, which can be tackled by advocating for more uniform policies that support open access growth.
How do you see the needs of residents in multi-dwelling units differing from those in single-family homes when it comes to internet service?
Residents in MDUs often deal with shared infrastructure, which can lead to bandwidth congestion if not managed properly. Unlike single-family homes, where a household might have a dedicated connection, apartment dwellers need solutions that account for high density—think dozens of units streaming, gaming, or working from home simultaneously. There’s also the issue of installation logistics; wiring a multi-story building is far more complex than a standalone house. Providers need to focus on scalable, reliable tech like fiber-to-the-unit and robust Wi-Fi systems to meet these unique demands.
With ambitious goals like reaching 1.5 million fiber passings by 2027, what factors do you think are critical for companies to prioritize in their expansion plans?
Achieving such large-scale goals requires a laser focus on market selection and community engagement. Companies need to prioritize areas with high demand but low current coverage—think growing suburbs or urban pockets that have been overlooked. Infrastructure scalability is also key; building networks that can handle future growth without constant overhauls saves time and money. Finally, partnerships with local governments and ISPs can streamline permits and funding, ensuring projects stay on track. It’s about balancing ambition with practical execution.
Why do you think open access networks are less common in the U.S. compared to places like Europe, and what could change that?
In the U.S., the telecom market has historically been dominated by a few large players who prefer owning their networks outright, unlike Europe where regulatory frameworks often encourage shared infrastructure. There’s also a cultural difference—European policies have pushed for open access to ensure broad competition, while the U.S. has leaned on private investment with less oversight. What could shift this is growing awareness of the model’s benefits, like cost efficiency and better service in rural or underserved areas. If we see more successful case studies and supportive legislation, adoption could accelerate.
What is your forecast for the future of open access networks in the U.S. over the next decade?
I’m optimistic about the future of open access networks in the U.S. Over the next decade, I expect we’ll see significant growth, especially as demand for high-speed internet continues to skyrocket and funding from federal programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment initiative rolls out. These networks will likely become a cornerstone in bridging the digital divide, particularly in rural and urban underserved areas. With more providers jumping on board and technology advancing, I foresee open access becoming a standard approach in many markets, fostering competition and driving down costs for consumers.
